Reason to Doubt

Being a skeptic means changing your mind sometimes, so let's talk about all the stuff we've been wrong about! The Dunning-Kruger effect, definitions of atheism, Christianity, and anything else you want to ask us about. This is also our 1,000 sub celebration, so drop in and tell us about how great we are. We have a Patreon! Join up & you can get our videos a week early: patreon.com/ReasontoDoubt Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/reasontodoubt.bsky.social Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 3:53 - Dunning-Kruger Effect 16:53 - We have a Patreon now! 18:30 - Favorite Starfleet Captain 21:25 - Charlottesville "Unite the Right" Riots 27:08 - Definition of Atheism 35:16 - Our deconversions 39:30 - Veganism 43:00 - LGBTQ Rights 45:20 - Dr. Dan shows up! 50:10 - How to persuade people 1:00:45 - Becoming more politically left 1:06:40 - Chesh shows up! 1:09:20 - Priorities, not beliefs 1:12:00 - Abortion 1:16:00 - Assumptions & philosophy 1:24:00 - Jesus Mythicism 1:27:00 - Principles, not opinions 1:36:00 - Ball lightning 1:38:00 - Time isn't real 1:42:00 - Outro #skepticism #atheism

Just in time for the holidays, here's how to answer some common questions you might get from family when they learn you're no longer religious. This is volume 3 of our "So you think you're an atheist?" series. Let us know what you think we should do for the next installment! Join our Patreon for early access to all our videos! patreon.com/ReasontoDoubt Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/reasontodoubt.bsky.social Timestamps 00:00 - Intro 02:22 - Who hurt you? 04:46 - You just want to sin 06:59 - Aren't you afraid of going to hell? 12:22 - If there is not god what is the point of life? 15:54 - Look at the trees! 16:52 - What if you are wrong? 21:30 - Aren't you being too skeptical? 24:31 - Why can't you just keep it to yourself? 26:44 - You think you are right and EVERYONE else is wrong? 30:53 - What convinced you? 33:00 - Summary/Conclusion #atheism #christianity

Can God be good if they condemn people to an eternity in hell? Today we are engaging with some "Pew level" apologetics, the kind of points you will very frequently find in the comments sections of our videos. After watching this, you'll be ready to field these questions yourselves! Join our Patreon for early access to all our videos! patreon.com/ReasontoDoubt Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/reasontodoubt.bsky.social Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 2:52 - Shouldn't God punish the guilty? 5:36 - All you have to do is believe 7:10 - You CHOOSE to go to hell 10:45 - No TRUE Christian disagrees 13:08 - God isn't being unreasonable 15:23 - Adam & Eve messed up 18:14 - How DARE you question God!? 20:54 - Eternal Conscious Torment invalidates a benevolent God 23:18 - Summary & Outro #atheism #doubt #faith #deconstruction #hell

How do you come out as an atheist? Should you come out? Do you need to stop being religious? We're continuing out "So you think you're an atheist" series, aimed at those who are wrestling with doubts & may be just learning that they no longer believe. Today's episode is aimed at those who have just decided to deconvert...what now? Join our Patreon for early access to all our videos! patreon.com/ReasontoDoubt Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/reasontodoubt.bsky.social Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 0:57 - What NOT to do 1:45 - Do you need to leave at all? 4:18 - Community 8:20 - Traditions 9:30 - Having THAT conversation 16:20 - Outro #atheism #doubt #faith #deconstruction

Are you experiencing doubt? Have you been religious, but now you aren't quite sure whether you still believe in God? This video series is for you! We're going to be covering the sort of questions that people wrestling with doubt tend to have and providing the answers & resources we wish we had when we were deconstructing our faith. Freedom From Religion Foundation: https://ffrf.org/ @AnswersinReason : https://www.youtube.com/@AnswersinReason Crash Course Philosophy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1A_CAkYt3GY&list=PLUHoo4L8qXthO958RfdrAL8XAHvk5xuu9 Join us on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/ReasontoDoubt Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/reasontodoubt.bsky.social Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 1:50 - What is an atheist? 3:00 - What is belief? 4:50 - Atheist != Skeptic 8:19 - Do I need to disprove god? 10:22 - How will I know right and wrong? 13:30 - How to deal with uncertainty 15:20 - Resources 17:27 - Summary #atheism #doubt #faith #deconstruction

Another day, another video of Creationists abusing data to get the answers they want. This time we're talking about geology, Jupiter's moons, and the rings of Saturn. Corrections: - I know the half life of C14 is 5,730 years. I said "around 5500" to make the math easy. - At 33:53 I said Ken Ham, I meant Kent Hovind (though Ham is a grifter too) C14 in coal: https://youtube.com/live/_fpCa8K3jE0 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VY7DbIi6zkBakELWXlhj7cNpN9XViRA5Nr4gzPhPRAA/edit?usp=sharing John (Age of Rocks) blog: https://ageofrocks.wordpress.com/2014/02/13/45-thousand-year-old-fossil-wood-encased-in-45-million-year-old-basalt-conflict-revisited/ https://ageofrocks.wordpress.com/2014/05/30/best-evidences-for-a-young-earth-snelling-and-the-ocean-sediment-flux/ Join us on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/ReasontoDoubt Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/reasontodoubt.bsky.social Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 1:00 - C14 dating on wood inside basalt 7:23 - Sediment deposition 13:40 - Jupiter's moons 19:40 - Saturn's rings 22:40 - Global population 28:00 - C14 in dinosaur bones 32:00 - Creationist tactics 36:30 - Fallacy of the Day #atheism #creationism #christianity #science

Frank Turek and Allen Parr team up to ask the question: How many out of context quotes can we grab from Stephen Hawking to prove our point? Also, does cosmology prove that a God exists? Other videos: Resurrection: https://youtu.be/Em_5U7Gj2BA Miracle debate: https://youtu.be/SIN4vftKMGA Multiverses w/ Jeff Zweerink: https://youtu.be/T94bPK87Ku0 Join us on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/ReasontoDoubt Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/reasontodoubt.bsky.social Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 0:32 - The Right Question 1:40 - The Big Bang = Beginning? 13:40 - Beginning = Cause = God? 20:00 - Spaceless, timeless, personal cause... 25:30 - Jesus' Resurrection 27:40 - Fine-tuning of the universe 32:45 - The Multiverse as an escape hatch 45:30 - No evidence for the multiverse 51:00 - Wrap-Up & Fallacy of the Day #atheism #cosmology #christianity #science

Creation Ministries International is back at it again, this time with a lengthy video that tries to show that radiometric dating (and other methods to date the Earth) are terrible & bad & icky. Unfortunately, they're wrong and probably also lying about it. Original video: https://youtu.be/zSGGnx2dT3k?si=h6r5GY06ApnuAqKu Proof of Isochron: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_ONdo4cs9lw2qeGD9W7BdLGtFE2DoQd9/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=107126622609466645508&rtpof=true&sd=true Heat problem episode: https://www.youtube.com/live/WEBncTYQwcg?si=Ua37s_JPLWp7IzIt Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/reasontodoubt.bsky.social Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 1:30 - Confirmation bias in action 8:20 - You weren't there! 12:46 - Radiometric dating assumptions 18:15 - How radiometric dating works 38:00 - For the Bible Tells Me So 41:50 - Deep time is not an assumption 52:30 - Mount St Helens 1:01:30 - Lying for Jesus 1:06:00 - Bias of the Day 1:10:30 - Outro #creationism #skepticism #science

According to Mythicists like David Fitzgerald and Richard Carrier, Biblical scholarship as a field cannot be trusted. It is overrun by Christians who ruthlessly punish anyone who steps out of line, and because of this scholars in the field can't disagree with the dogma of Jesus' existence even if they wanted to! So we decided we'd bring on Kipp Davis, a Biblical scholar who is NOT a Christian to give his perspective on the field. Check out Dr Kipp Davis: https://www.youtube.com/@DrKippDavis https://twitter.com/DrKippDavis Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/reasontodoubt.bsky.social #history #bible #atheism #mythicism

In this episode Jordan responds to a recent video from Capturing Christianity where he interviews Guy R. Powell about the Shroud of Turin. This video covers the radiocarbon dating, the history of the Shroud from Jerusalem to France, and various other claims. Correction: At 41:18 I say "A lot of [the beta particles] will be decayed". I meant to say that a lot of the beta particles will be ABSORBED (by the Shroud itself) If you want to see more debunking on the Shroud, check out this playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyrDr51A_LfztBbvIel7JmbgxLgE29Wzy Miracle debate w/ Dale (Real Seekers): https://youtu.be/SIN4vftKMGA Original @CapturingChristianity video: https://www.youtube.com/live/jpr4bMKADCs?si=-85ApEX4AHP5As1G Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/reasontodoubt.bsky.social Spreadsheet with C14 calculations: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OhECBGHLMsvYoaI6K3NTqSs3DsS4ekIL9erbCuINuMM/edit?usp=sharing Sources Riani et al, "Regression analysis with partially labelled regressors: carbon dating of the Shroud of Turin", Stat Comput (2013) 23:551-561, DOI 10.1007/s11222-012-9329-5 Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 1:38 - What to call people who believe in the Shroud 2:11 - Book summary 6:05 - Radiocarbon dating 17:02 - Coincidence of the Shroud's history 18:30 - Galatians 3:1 reference 20:20 - Difficulties in reconstructing history 23:45 - Image on the Shroud 30:11 - Radiation hypothesis 34:14 - Bob Rucker's neutron irradiation hypothesis 38:40 - Challenge to Shroud Researchers 45:28 - Summary 46:13 - Bias of the Day #christianity #shroudofturin #atheism #history

Is it rational to conclude that a miracle really happened? It turns out...we agree! Okay, so that statement (and the meme) isn't *quite* true, because Dale definitely both believes in miracles and that it's rational for him to do so...but we DO end up agreeing on a lot and have a very productive conversation along the way. Original video: https://youtu.be/p0DoRiNgKxw Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/reasontodoubt.bsky.social Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 1:05 - Dale's Opening 27:20 - Jordan's Opening 39:50 - Naturalism of the gaps 41:30 - Prior probability of miracles 45:00 - Testimony of miracles 50:00 - Miracles are rare 55:30 - Divine hiddenness 1:04:10 - Geographic distribution of religions 1:07:50 - Can miracles get you to god? 1:11:40 - Non-Christian miracles 1:20:00 - Types of miracles 1:26:20 - Shroud of Turin 1:30:00 - Inner witness of the Holy Spirit 1:37:20 - We agree! 1:39:15 - Bayes' Theorem 1:42:10 - Holy Spirit as a Miracle 1:44:20 - Bias of the Day #miracles #christianity #atheism #debate

Gay pastors? Children thinking it's okay for two women to get married? What's next, love and acceptance for all!? In this video we respond to the harmful, homophobic rhetoric of Frederick Clement of By the Book Ministries. These kind of talking points do real, demonstrable harm to the LGBTQ community and it needs to be called out. Original videos: https://youtu.be/UH0nmsAVIXM https://youtu.be/Wonsti-pQzk Test your own implicit bias: https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Intro 0:00 - Intro 2:00 - What is love? 4:57 - Gay Pastors 12:25 - Being gay is a choice 19:20 - Homophobia in the church 27:50 - Protecting children 37:20 - LGBTQ & left-handedness 45:50 - Polygamy 47:15 - Christianity & patriarchy 48:30 - Cherry picking 51:30 - Parallels with racism 52:50 - Final thoughts 55:30 - Bias of the day #lgbtq #atheism #christianity #pride

Today we talk to author Jo Lloyd Johnson about her new book "Silenced in Eden", which details her journey out of a fundamentalist Christian upbringing. She shares her story of abuse, subjugation, and the enforced silence of women in patriarchal communities. Trigger warning: This video addresses some sensitive topics related to sexual, physical, and religious abuse, which may be difficult for some listeners. We want to emphasize the importance of self-care while watching this content. If at any point you feel overwhelmed or need to step away, please prioritize your well-being and take a break. Remember, seeking professional support and talking to a mental health expert is always encouraged if you find this content particularly challenging to process. If you choose to watch, we ask that you approach this content with sensitivity and respect for those affected. Let us all create a safe space for sharing and supporting each other throughout this video's discussion. Thank you for your understanding, and remember, you are not alone. Silenced in Eden Book can be obtained here: https://www.amazon.com/Silenced-Eden-Jo-Lloyd-Johnson-ebook/dp/B0BRBQM8LC/ Louder than Silence supports survivors of sexual violence through reimbursed EMDR therapy, mentor programs, workshops, and support groups: www.LouderthanSilence.org

Allen Parr (with Jeremiah Johnston) put out his top 5 SHOCKING REASONS why the Shroud of Turin shows the face of Jesus and it was shockingly bad. Join me to hear how bad it is. We'll cover the image formation, radiocarbon/C14 dating, pollen, Hungarian Pray Codex, and more. Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com See our other Shroud of Turin content: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyrDr51A_LfztBbvIel7JmbgxLgE29Wzy Original video: https://youtu.be/ZyyFnEekiE4 Papers cited: Casabianca, T., et al. “RADIOCARBON DATING OF THE TURIN SHROUD: NEW EVIDENCE FROM RAW DATA.” Archaeometry, 2019, doi: 10.1111/arcm.12467. Dal Bo, Federico. “JESUS’ TRIAL IN THE LATIN TALMUD Tractate Sanhedrin and its Translation in the Extractiones de Talmud.” University of Heidelberg, 2019, ISSN 0393-6805. Damon, P.E., et al. “Radiocarbon Dating of the Shroud of Turin.” Nature, vol. 337, 1989. Lazzaro, Paolo Di, et al. “Statistical and Proactive Analysis of an Inter- Laboratory Comparison: The Radiocarbon Dating of the Shroud of Turin.” Entropy, vol. 22, 2020, doi:10.3390/e22090926. Meachem, William, et al. “The Authentication of the Turin Shroud: An Issue in Archaeological Epistemology.” Current Anthropology, vol. 24, no. 3, 1983, https://www.shroud.com/meacham2.htm. Riani, Marco, et al. “Regression analysis with partially labelled regressors: carbon dating of the Shroud of Turin.” Stat Comput, vol. 23, 2013, pp. 551-561, DOI 10.1007/s11222-012-9329-5. Walsh, Bryan, and Larry Schwalbe. “An instructive inter-laboratory comparison: The 1988 radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin.” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, vol. 29, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.102015. Timestamps 0:00 - Intro 0:45 - Primer on the Shroud 2:11 - Reason #5: Most studied artifact 4:30 - Weapons Specialists 6:40 - Lots of research 10:50 - Reason #4: Image formation 16:20 - Reason #3: Radiocarbon dating 18:40 - How radiocarbon dating works 21:05 - Peer reviewed journals on C14 dating 27:20 - Invisible reweave hypothesis 29:30 - Reason #2: 3d Image 33:00 - Reason #1: Kitchen sink 36:00 - 1a: Floral 36:45 - 1b: Numismatic 37:30 - 1c: Textile/Fabric 38:35 - 1d: Hematological 39:30 - Now for something completely different 44:40 - Misc. Points 49:40 - Hungarian Pray Codex 50:30 - Outro #shroudofturin #history #atheism #christianity

Steve Schramm, AKA @winsomecreationist believes that science and Young Earth Creationism work well together...unfortunately, he's wrong. If Young Earth Creationism is true, science is DEAD! Original video: https://youtu.be/f0v9ixpR7xQ Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 0:31 - YEC Background info 1:05 - Definition of Science 1:45 - Marty's Question 2:30 - God changed physics? 4:25 - An orderly universe 5:35 - Bible author's didn't know physics 7:42 - "God changed physics" Strikes Back 11:50 - Saying the quiet part outloud 14:10 - How can we trust the YEC God? 17:30 - Summary of the argument 18:19 - The Altar Call 21:30 - Bias of the Day #atheism #creationism #skepticism #science

It's Pride month, so let's talk to a biologist about why sex isn't binary! The short story is that biology is complicated, messy, and doesn't care about out labels! Make sure to sub to @CreationMyths for more great biology content Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Stand to reason thing: https://www.str.org/w/humans-come-in-only-two-sexes https://www.hrc.org/resources/understanding-the-intersex-community Useful Links https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/treating-trans-youth-with-dr-izzy-lowell-2021/id1382983397?i=1000551858078 https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/protecting-trans-rights-chase-strangio-podcast-transcript-ncna1049541 https://podcasts.nu/avsnitt/why-is-this-happening-with-chris-hayes/between-god-and-man-with-daniel-m-lavery Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 3:50 - What is binary? 5:45 - What is sex? 8:30 - Chromosomes 11:00 - Gametes 13:40 - Sex is complicated 18:30 - Biology has exceptions 22:15 - How common is this 26:00 - "Fairness" in sports 28:30 - The spectrum of sex determination 40:45 - Useful resources (see description) 44:00 - Summary 45:20 - Outro 47:20 - Fallacy of the Day: False Dichotomy #biology #science #lgbtq #pride

A *critical* review of the brutal debate between @ProfessorDaveExplains and @DrJamesTour titled "Are we clueless about the Origin of Life?" This debate was extremely tough to watch, but thankfully now you don't have to! You can see just the highlights, including: Old man angrily waves chalk and younger man calls him a liar. This review is heavily edited for the sake of time. Find the original debate here: https://youtu.be/KvGdllx9pJU Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 2:24 - James Opening 10:11 - Dave Opening 23:36 - James Question 1 31:39 - Dave Question 1 35:36 - James Question 2 45:54 - Dave Question 2 49:34 - James Question 3 52:55 - Dave Question 3 56:50 - Summary #skepticism #atheism #debate #creationism

The evidence for Jesus is good, but it's not THAT good. Specifically, it isn't better than the evidence for every other figure in the ancient world, as some Christians would have you believe. It's not even close! Let's break down what there is for the Dictator of Rome, Julius Caesar, and everyone's favorite rabbi. Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Special thanks to Brenden Kyer @MagisterKyer for his help in pulling some sources together to prep for this episode! Sources: Writings of Cicero: https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/9776/pg9776-images.html Counts of Manuscripts: https://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.com/2015/05/distribution-of-new-testament.html https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/liste Coinage: http://www.humanities.mq.edu.au/acans/caesar/Intro_Overview.htm Traditional Authorship: https://ehrmanblog.org/mark-as-peters-scribe-for-members/ Christians making this claim: https://billygraham.org/devotion/evidence-of-jesus/ https://www2.cbn.com/news/us/jesus-real-how-history-and-science-validate-christ-existed-and-gospels-are-true https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/sources-for-caesar-and-jesus-compared/ https://biblearchaeologyreport.com/2019/02/15/the-earliest-new-testament-manuscripts/ Timestamps 0:00 - Intro 1:28 - Christian Claims About Evidence 5:00 - Evidence for Jesus 22:45 - Evidence for Caesar 45:00 - Wrap-up/Comparison 48:30 - Bias of the Day

Shroud super skeptic Hugh Farey helps us debunk some popular arguments we saw made in the comments section of our previous Shroud of Turin videos: The back wound pattern, the anatomy & nail location, the blood type, pollen, and limestone from the Holy Land. Turns out they aren't as strong as you might think! NOTE: Hugh presents a LOT of images in this one, so you may want to at least pull up the YouTube video afterwards so you can see what you were missing: https://youtu.be/_c43oVE9t2U If you haven't seen our previous Shroud videos, check them out here: Episode 1 (Radiometric dating & invisible patches): https://youtu.be/G4yHs6IjBFQ Episode 2 (Image formation, Radiation, & Chemistry): https://youtu.be/5WOdy3-w6xg Episode 3 (Art, Pollen, & Patterns): https://youtu.be/j3wffpHYleY Debate w/ Real Seekers: https://youtu.be/xngAYdwAsKM Hugh's links: https://independent.academia.edu/HughFarey https://medievalshroud.com/ Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Timestamps 0:00 - Intro 1:15 - Hugh Farey’s Background 5:30 - Back Wounds/Roman Flagrum 11:50 - Trigger Warning - Gore Begins 13:23 - Trigger Warning - Gore Ends 18:40 - Hand Wounds 30:45 - Blood Type 44:23 - Pollen 58:45 - Limestone 1:10:00 - Questioning Shroud Research 1:18:00 - Conclusion #skepticism #history #shroudofturin #atheism

Heresy lurks around every corner...perhaps...even in YOU! This week we're delving into the intriguing world of Christian heresies. From ancient theological debates to contemporary beliefs, we'll shed some light on how some modern Christians unknowingly perpetuate these ancient deviations from orthodoxy! We'll talk about some notable heresies such as Sabellianism, Pelagianism, & Arianism, talk about what they believed, and see how Christians today unwittingly subscribe to them. Note: This video is meant to be fun and educational. We don't think any Christian claims are true, and so what counts as "heresy" and "orthodoxy" is, in our estimation, arbitrary. Theology Survey: https://thestateoftheology.com Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Timestamps 0:00 - Intro 2:00 - You Might Be A Heretic 3:30 - Sabellianism 7:45 - Pelagianism 17:30 - Monothelitism 22:10 - Antinomianism 25:45 - Marcionism 32:55 - Arianism 40:45 - Takeaways/Wrap-up 33:50 - Extra Surveys! 46:00 - Conclusion 46:30 - Bias of the Day #atheism #christianity #religion

The number of Jesuses in Biblical Scholarship is too damn high! In this episode Jordan and Jared continue their review of David Fitzgerald's book "Jesus: Mything in Action" Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Timestamps 0:00 - Intro 1:45 - Personal Jesus 4:28 - Jesus of Faith v Jesus of History 8:08 - 19 Jesi 19:00 - Apocalyptic Prophet 24:00 - Why did Jesus Die? 29:16 - Impact on History 10:45 - Rating the Resurrection 35:35 - Reconstructing the Historical Jesus 37:17 - Criticism of David Fitzgerald's work 44:00 - Recap/Summary #atheism #mythicism #history #skepticism #jesus

The moment you've all been waiting for: What *really* happened to Jesus? Honestly, we don't know for sure, but we think this idea is way more plausible than a supernatural resurrection! This is the final part of our mini-series on the Minimal Facts approach to Jesus' resurrection. Some of this you've seen before, but we're betting you haven't heard this approach to Paul! If you are interested in learning more about apocalyptic Judaism or what Jesus likely taught, we recommend checking out the works of Bart Ehrman as an accessible first step. Here's a video to get you started: https://youtu.be/h6-8AoJQ_p4 Video of a Christian who had a visionary experience and converted to Islam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIVlmRee5Ew&t=72s Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Works Cited Castelnovo, Anna, et al. “Post-bereavement hallucinatory experiences: A critical overview of population and clinical studies.” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 186, 2015, pp. 266-274, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.032. Grimby, A. “Bereavement among elderly people: grief reactions, post-bereavement hallucinations and quality of life.” Acta Psychiatr Scand, vol. 87, 1993, pp. 72-80. Hayes, Jacqueline. Experiencing the presence of the deceased: Symptoms, spirits, or ordinary life? PhD Thesis, University of Manchester. 2011. Kamp, Karina, et al. “Sensory and Quasi-Sensory Experiences of the Deceased in Bereavement: An Interdisciplinary and Integrative Review.” Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol. 46, no. 6, 2020, pp. 1367-1381, doi:10.1093/schbul/sbaa113. Laroi, Frank, et al. “Culture and Hallucinations: Overview and Future Directions.” Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol. 40, no. 4, 2014, pp. 213-220. Matchett, WF. “Repeated hallucinatory experiences as a part of the mourning process among Hopi Indian women.” Psychiatry, vol. 35, no. 2, 1972, pp. 185-194. Olson, P. Richard, et al. “Hallucinations of Widowhood.” Journal of the American Geriatric Society, vol. 33, pp. 543-547. Rees, W. Dewi. “The Hallucinations of Widowhood.” British Medical Journal, vol. 4, 1971, pp. 37-41. Sabucedo, Pablo, et al. “Perceiving those who are gone: Cultural research on post-bereavement perception or hallucination of the deceased.” Transcultural Psychiatry, 2020, doi:10.1177/1363461520962887. Timestamps 0:00 - Intro 1:20 - Recap 5:18 - Our Hypothesis 7:06 - Apocalyptic Jews 9:30 - Followers of Jesus 10:48 - Jesus Crucified 15:13 - Post Bereavement Hallucinations 26:00 - Disciple's Experiences 31:19 - What About Paul? 39:48 - Assessment of both Hypothesis 49:00 - Wrap-up 51:15 - Fallacy of the Day #skepticism #atheism #jesus #history #resurrection

@MikeLiconaOfficial , New Testament historian and Christian apologist, thinks that the Resurrection Hypothesis best explains the Minimal Facts. Today we test Licona's hypothesis using his own historical criteria. While Licona (unsurprisingly) gives his own hypothesis high marks for being the most likely historical explanation of the Minimal Facts, Jordan & Jared come to a different conclusion. If you're not familiar with the Minimal Facts approach to arguing for the Resurrection, check out last week's video. Next week, we'll be running a natural alternative through the same criteria! Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Timestamps 0:00 - Recap of the Minimal Facts 2:00 - Inference to the Best Explanation 4:21 - Plausibility 5:10 - Explanatory Scope 5:34 - Explanatory Power 6:30 - Simplicity or Less Ad-Hoc 8:10 - The Resurrection Hypothesis 10:45 - Rating the Resurrection 13:55 - You can't know everything in the past 15:22 - Hume's miracle objection 18:40 - Naturalism of the Gaps 21:33 - Equal probability isn't necessarily correct 25:20 - Horses, not zebras 27:00 - Not all supernaturalist ideas are equivalent 30:30 - RH is ad-hoc 35:40 - The resurrection isn't good history 37:50 - Summary 40:00 - Fallacy of the Day: 50/50 Fallacy #atheism #history #resurrection #jesus #christianity

The "Minimal Facts Approach" is the most popular argument for the Resurrection used by apologetics. Let's see how it stands up to scrutiny! In this episode, we look at the available evidence and historical methods used to determine what most probably happened in the past, and then see how well supported the "Minimal Facts" are. In the next episode, we'll see how the Minimal Facts holds up against non-supernatural explanations for the Resurrection. Should be useful for believers or skeptics alike! Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com #atheism #history #jesus #resurrection

In this video, Jordan and Jared sit down with Chat GPT to create 10 thought-provoking questions for atheists. They answer the questions as atheists themselves, and then compare their responses to Chat GPT's AI-generated answers. From discussing the existence of God to the meaning of life, this video is sure to challenge your beliefs and make you think deeply about your worldview. Watch until the end to see how the human answers stack up against the AI answers, and to gain a greater understanding of the limitations and capabilities of artificial intelligence in philosophical discussions. Don't miss this fascinating exploration of belief systems and the human mind! Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Timestamps 0:00 - Intro 2:07 - Question 1 4:45 - Question 2 9:18 - Question 3 12:56 - Question 4 20:05 - Question 5 25:24 - Question 6 29:29 - Question 7 33:42 - Question 8 36:51 - Question 9 41:12 - Question 10 43:50 - Conclusion/Summary

Welcome to our latest video on skepticism! In this episode, Jared, Jordan, and Dave dive into the fascinating world of skepticism, exploring its history, defining what it is and is not, and sharing best practices for approaching this important topic. Throughout the video, we discuss the origins of skepticism and its evolution over time, from ancient Greece to the present day. We also delve into the key principles of skepticism, including critical thinking, empirical evidence, and open-mindedness, as well as debunking common misconceptions about what skepticism entails. Whether you're a seasoned skeptic or simply curious about this fascinating field, this video is sure to provide valuable insights and information. So sit back, relax, and join us for a lively and engaging conversation about one of the most important topics of our time. Don't forget to like and subscribe for more great content! Check out Dave and the great work he has been doing here! @AnswersinReason and @TrolleyDave Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Timestamps 0:00 - Intro 2:00 - What does it mean to be a skeptic? 3:45 - Cartesian skepticism 8:00 - Epistemology: What does it mean to know? 13:00 - Certainty and being fallible 14:15 - Methodological skepticism 17:00 - Poor skepticism by "skeptics" 23:30 - Evidence and fallacies 31:50 - Goals of skepticism 37:00 - Doubt & background evidence 40:20 - Tangent on science 42:45 - I don't know is acceptable 49:30 - Where to find Dave 50:00 - Fallacy of the Day 52:30 - Outro #skeptic #philosophy #atheism #skepticism

In this episode, Jared and Nick, from @RealityInsights engage in a stimulating conversation about the complex topic of substitutionary atonement. They explore its historical development, its place in Christian theology, and alternative theories of atonement. Substitutionary atonement is a central doctrine of many Christian traditions, holding that Jesus Christ took on the punishment for humanity's sins, thereby reconciling humanity with God. But how do Christians and atheists approach this idea? What is the historical and theological basis for this belief, and how do alternative theories of atonement fit into the picture? Jared and Nick bring their diverse perspectives and knowledge to bear on these questions, drawing on biblical texts and historical scholarship. They examine the key features of substitutionary atonement, such as the concepts of penalty, sacrifice, and propitiation, and consider how these have been interpreted and applied in different contexts. Moreover, they explore alternative theories of atonement, such as Christus Victor, moral influence, and ransom theory, which offer different perspectives on the nature and effects of the cross and resurrection. They discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each theory, and consider how they relate to the broader theological frameworks of Christian thought and atheistic worldviews. Whether you're a Christian seeking to deepen your understanding of your faith, or an atheist curious about the theological ideas that shape our culture, this conversation is sure to engage and challenge you. So join Jared and Nick as they navigate the complex terrain of substitutionary atonement and its alternatives, and discover new insights into the nature of salvation and redemption. Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ YouTube: youtube.com/@ReasonToDoubt

The start of our book review of David Fitzgerald's book "Jesus: Mything in Action", which follows in the footsteps of Richard Carrier and others to argue that Jesus was never more than a myth. We start at the beginning of the book to answer David's first question: Why aren't more historians mythicists? Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ YouTube: youtube.com/@ReasonToDoubt Timestamps 0:00 - Intro 2:02 - What is mythicism? 3:45 - Episode outline 4:03 - Why aren't historians mythicists? 9:34 - Confessions of faith and biblical scholarship 13:58 - Religious institutions survey data 19:20 - Response from David on survey methodology 20:17 - How prevalent are religious schools really? 24:50 - Survey summary 27:00 - Persecution anecdotes 28:00 - Case 1: Mike Licona 32:00 - Case 6: Anthony Ledonne 35:00 - What David left out of the story 37:00 - What about the non-Christian scholars? 39:00 - Carrier's Canadian girlfriend 42:00 - Summary 46:50 - Fallacy of the Day 48:30 - Outro #atheism #history #mythicism #jesus #bible

Everything you think you know about Battleship (2012) is a LIE. By the overwhelming audience request of a single person, here is my rant on why Battleship is actually brilliant. Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ YouTube: youtube.com/@ReasonToDoubt Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 0:50 - Thesis Statement 1:50 - Planet G 2:20 - "Communications Ship" = Command Vessel 3:20 - First Contact 5:30 - Boarding Actions 7:30 - "Attack" on Hawaii 9:30 - The REAL Story 11:30 - The Secret Subplot 12:50 - Message to Jon & Erich Hoeber 13:16 - Outro

In this video Jordan and Jared take a closer look into UFOs and UAPs. We briefly cover the history of UFOs and discuss the recent uptake of sightings of UAPs as well as breakdown a few of the more famous incidents. Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com Sources and Citations House Intelligence C3 Subcommittee hearing on UAPs (5/17/22) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSDweUbGBow Gimbal Video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TumprpOwHY Mick West Breakdown of Gimbal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsEjV8DdSbs&t=173 Simulation Website - https://www.metabunk.org/gimbal/ Tic-Tac Video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWLZgnmRDs4 Mick West Breakdown of Tic-Tac - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1di0XIa9RQ ___________ Timestamps 0:00 - Introduction 3:28 - UFO History 7:52 - Past Government Investigations 9:20 - UAP New Name/New Perspective 10:47 - Why now? 12:48 - Recent Government Reports 15:06 - House Investigation Committee 15:30 - Flyby Incident 16:28 - Triangle Incident 17:02 - Gimbal Incident 22:08 - Tic-tac Incident 33:13 Summary/Wrap-up 38:08 - Fallacy of the Day

In this episode Jared and Jordan respond to Greg Koukl's video on the @STRvideos channel "The Question that Stops Christians in Their Tracks" Are all non-believers going to hell!? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOoUDpqtq-k Timestamps 0:00 - Introduction 1:36 - The Question 3:31 - Makes Greg Look Bad 4:20 - Side Stepping The Question 5:29 - Interview with Deepak Chopra 8:20 - To Engage or Not to Engage 10:32 - First Question 13:47 - Second Question 15:19 - They know they are a sinner 17:17 - Want a Pardon? 18:18 - Atonement 33:50 - Fallacy of the Day

Let's look back into skeptic history: Crop circles! What did people think about them before they knew about hoaxing methods, and what lessons can we draw from that for other extraordinary claims today. Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReasontoDoubt Citations/Sources: Interview with Meaden: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg12617230-900-airy-crop-circle-theory-faces-its-critics/ MUFON Article: https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/alien.ufo/UFOBBS/1000/1220.ufo Richard Taylor's take on crop circles: https://physicsworld.com/a/coming-soon-to-a-field-near-you/ Reveal of Dave & Doug: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYV_zpCXYtc W. C. Levengood “Semi-Molten Meteroic iron Associated with a Crop Formation” published in the “Journal of Scientific Exploration”, 1995 W. C. Levengood “Dispersion of energies in worldwide crop formations” published in "Physiologia Plantarum", 1999 Microwave Calculations https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1A3s18tqs4FFsZwkXPPBIF8MdEv6COkCIA9CxjjOmWyE/edit?usp=sharing John Capron published in Nature, 1880: "The storms about this part of Surrey have been lately local and violent, and the effects produced in some instances curious. Visiting a neighbour's farm on Wednesday evening (21st), we found a field of standing wheat considerably knocked about, not as an entirety, but in patches forming, as viewed from a distance, circular spots. Examined more closely, these all presented much the same character, viz., a few standing stalks as a center, some prostrate stalks with their heads arranged pretty evenly in a direction forming a circle round the center, and outside these a circular wall of stalks which had not suffered, I sent a sketch made on the spot, giving an idea of the most perfect of these patches. The soil is a sandy loam upon the greensand, and the crop is vigorous, with strong stems, and I could not trace locally any circumstances accounting for the peculiar forms of the patches in the field, nor indicating whether it was wind or rain, or both combined, which had caused them, beyond the general evidence everywhere of heavy rainfall. They were suggestive to me of some cyclonic wind action, and may perhaps have been noticed elsewhere by some of your readers." Timestamps 0:00 - Intro 2:00 - Why crop circles? 2:50 - What is a crop circle 4:40 - Crop circle history 8:30 - Modern crop circles 10:30 - Scientific explanations 14:00 - Diagnostic characteristics of "genuine" circles 17:20 - The Big Reveal 21:00 - A Cautionary Tale 26:50 - Remaining crop circle theories 31:45 - Alternative explanations 35:40 - Microwave calculations 38:15 - Outstanding questions 40:45 - Summary 41:33 - Fallacy of the Day: Begging the Question 44:45 - Outro

Jordan and Jared interview Dr. Randal Rauser (@Randal_Rauser ) about his new book "The Doubters' Creed: How to Be a Christian When You Don't Believe It's True." This video was delayed because of a bunch of technical issues, during which Randal was extremely gracious and patient in working with us. A practical example of loving your neighbor in action! Check out Randal's book on Amazon: https://a.co/d/bj4QSvd or interact with him on Twitter at @RandalRauser Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ YouTube: youtube.com/@ReasonToDoubt Timestamps 0:00 - Intro 1:20 - Who is the book for? 3:00 - I believe; help my unbelief 8:30 - Agitation apologetics 15:55 - Naturalists 21:50 - Doxastic volunteerism 26:10 - Is this just Pascal's Wager? 31:30 - Why Christianity? 33:16 - How to answer Fundamentalists 38:40 - Spiritual atheism 41:00 - All you need is love!

In our last installment (for now), we're going to talk about art history, pollen, and other patterns with the Shroud of Turin, and why we think the Shroud is not the authentic burial cloth of Jesus. Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@reasontodoubt Citations Raes, Gilbert, ‘The Textile Study of 1973-1974’, Shroud Spectrum International, Issue 38/39, 1991 Vial, Gabriel, ‘Shrouded in Mystery’, HALI (The International Magazine of Fine Carpets and Textiles), Issue 49, 1990 Boi, M. “POLLEN ON THE SHROUD OF TURIN: THE PROBABLE TRACE LEFT BY ANOINTING AND EMBALMING.” Archaeometry, 2016, doi: 10.1111/arcm.12269. De Wesselow, Thomas. The Shroud of Turin and the Secret of the Resurrection. Penguin Group, 2012. Monson, Tesla, et al. “Allometric Variation in Modern Humans and the Relationship Between Body Proportions and Elite Athletic Success.” Journal of Anthropology of Sport and Physical Education, 2018, DOI 10.26773/jaspe.180701. Wilson, Ian. The Shroud: The 2000-Year-Old Mystery Solved. 2011. Timestamps 0:00 - Intro Video 0:45 - Summary & setting expectations 3:50 - Pray Codex aka Hungarian Pray Codex 9:50 - Pray Codex - No thumbs 11:40 - Pray Codex - Jesus is naked 13:15 - Pray Codex - Weave pattern & burns 21:50 - Pray Codex - No beard 22:45 - Lack of peer reviewed data on the Shroud's history 26:00 - Images throughout history 29:10 - Ian Wilson's amazing theory 34:45 - Pollen on the Shroud 38:30 - Weave pattern on the Shroud 43:05 - Body proportions 49:50 - Is the Shroud of Turin authentic? 52:30 - What surprised us 54:00 - "Fallacy" of the Day: BS asymmetry principle #shroudofturin #atheism #jesus #history #christianity

We go deep in the weeds on how the image on the Shroud of Turin could have been made. Artists, chemical reactions, and radiation (oh my)! Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@reasontodoubt Joel Duff video on peer review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZYM4D4IVG8 Citations Baldacchini, Giuseppe, et al. “Coloring linens with excimer lasers to simulate the body image of the Turin Shroud.” APPLIED OPTICS, vol. 47, no. 9, 2008. Fanti, G. “Hypotheses Regarding the Formation of the Body Image on the Turin Shroud. A Critical Compendium.” Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, vol. 55, no. 6, 2011, doi: 10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2011.55.6.060507 Fanti, G., et al. “Microscopic and Macroscopic Characteristics of the Shroud of Turin Image Superficiality.” Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, 2010, DOI: 10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2010.54.4.040201. Fanti, Giulio, and Giuseppe Zagotto. “Blood reinforced by pigments in the reddish stains of the Turin Shroud.” Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 25, 2017, pp. 113-120, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.12.012. Fazio, Giovanni, and Giuseppe Mandaglio. “COULD THE TURIN SHROUD BODY IMAGE FORMATION BE EXPLAINED BY MAILLARD REACTION?” Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, vol. 21, no. 1, 2021, pp. 177-181, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4394070. Heller, J.H., and A.D. Adler. “A Chemical Investigation of the Shroud of Turin.” Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal, vol. 14, no. 3, 1981, pp. 81-103, DOI: 10.1080/00085030.1981.10756882. Ichikawa, Sadao. “Somatic Mutation Frequencies in Tradescantia Stamen Hairs Treated with Relatively Low Thermal Neutron Fluxes.” Radiation Research,, vol. 147, no. 1, 1997, pp. 109-114, doi:10.2307/3579449. Jackson, J. P., et al. “Correlation of image intensity on the Turin Shroud with the 3D structure of a human body shape.” Applied Optics, vol. 23, no. 14, 1984, pp. 2244-2270. Kearse, Kelly. “A revised, natural explanation for the shroud of turin image: creation of a composite Maillard reaction.” Historical Archaeology & Anthropological Sciences, 2020, DOI: 10.15406/jhaas.2020.05.00236. McCrone, Walter. “The Shroud of Turin: Blood or Artist's Pigment?” Acc. Chem. Res., vol. 23, 1990, pp. 77-83. Newhauser, Wayne, and Rui Zhang. “The physics of proton therapy.” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 60, 2015, doi:10.1088/0031-9155/60/8/R155. Rogers, Raymond, and Anna Arnoldi. “THE SHROUD OF TURIN: AN AMINO-CARBONYL REACTION (MAILLARD REACTION) MAY EXPLAIN THE IMAGE FORMATION.” MELANOIDINS IN FOOD AND HEALTH COST ACTION 919, vol. 4, 2003, pp. 106-114. “ROGERS’ MAILLARD REACTION HYPOTHESIS EXPLAINED IN DETAIL BY ROGERS HIMSELF.” 2012, https://shroudofturin.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/rogers-maillard-reaction-for-dan-blog-2.pdf. Accessed 1/1/2023. Rouvillois, Gildas. “A Point Of Nuclear Physics About The Shroud Of Turin.” https://www.shroud.com/grouvil.htm. Rucker, Robert. “Solving the Carbon Dating Problem for the Shroud of Turin.” 2022. Schwalbe, L. A., and R. N. Rogers. “Physics and Chemistry of the Shroud of Turin: A summary of the 1978 Investigation.” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 135, 1982, pp. 3-49. Walsh, Bryan, and Larry Schwalbe. “An instructive inter-laboratory comparison: The 1988 radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin.” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, no. 29, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.102015. #jesus #shroudofturin #history #atheism

Brian Holdsworth thinks that the existence of morality is incompatible with naturalism. In this episode, we're going to explore why we think he's wrong! Brian's video: https://youtu.be/wVmKQ9pxuFU Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt YouTube: https://youtube.com/ReasonToDoubt

In this episode Jared is going to discuss how the doctrine of the Trinity developed throughout Christian History. Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/ YouTube: https://youtube.com/ReasonToDoubt

Young Earth Creationists think the Earth is 6,000 years old. A common response to radiometric dates in the billions of years is that radioactive decay went faster in the past. That would have some...unfortunate side effects. Doc with relevant calculations: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZMc4Zk5ks0_ywc2DPn7_M0SA1BOPJg0z0J1IblQGFxk/edit?usp=sharing Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt YouTube: https://youtube.com/ReasonToDoubt

William Lane Craig has been making the rounds for saying we should believe in Christianity because it would be nice if it were true. Recently, he went on w/ Capturing Christianity to clarify. His clarifications are...not great. So let's talk about it. Our video on Pascal's Wager: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PT7CJRLX8w8 Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt YouTube: https://youtube.com/ReasonToDoubt

AiG is back at it again, claiming that C-14 in coal proves that its younger than the pyramids. Jordan debunks them with SCIENCE (and math)! Calculations: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VY7DbIi6zkBakELWXlhj7cNpN9XViRA5Nr4gzPhPRAA/edit?usp=sharing Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt YouTube: https://youtube.com/ReasonToDoubt

In this live video Jared and Jordan talk about Apocalyptic Eschatology and End-Time Prophecies. Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt YouTube: https://youtube.com/ReasonToDoubt

In this episode Jared and Jordan will take a deeper look at the Fermi Paradox in a live discussion. Are we alone in the universe? Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt YouTube: https://youtube.com/ReasonToDoubt

In this Episode Jordan and Jared give answers to one of those popular 10 questions for Atheists videos. Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt YouTube: https://youtube.com/ReasonToDoubt

David Fitzgerald, author of "Nailed" and "Jesus: Mything in Action" joins us to talk about why he thinks Jesus was purely a myth. Jump on and help us politely grill Dave! Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt YouTube: https://youtube.com/ReasonToDoubt

We're doing an in-depth examination of the evidence that the Shroud of Turin dates to the medieval period and is not the burial shroud of Jesus Christ. In this first episode, we're covering the radiometric dating & the "invisible patch" hypothesis. Next episode we'll be looking at how the image was made, the historical evidence, and a bunch of other claims. Interact with us: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt YouTube: https://youtube.com/ReasonToDoubt Thanks to Age of Rocks (https://twitter.com/ageofrocks) for his input on the radiometric dating! Sources cited in this episode: Bella, Marco, et al. “Comments on the analysis interpretation by Rogers and Latendresse regarding samples coming from the Shroud of Turin.” Thermochimica Acta, 2016 (not published), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.tca.2016.03.014. Bella, Marco, et al. “There is no mass spectrometry evidence that the C14 sample from the Shroud of Turin comes from a "medieval invisible mending."” Thermochimica Acta, no. 617, 2015, pp. 169-171, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2015.08.002. Casabianca, Tristan, et al. “Radiocarbon Dating of the Turin Shroud: New Evidence from Raw Data.” Archaeometry, 2019, doi: 10.1111/arcm.12467. Damon, P. E., et al. “Radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin.” Nature, vol. 337, no. 16, 1989, pp. 611-615. Di Lazzaro, Paolo, et al. “Statistical and Proactive Analysis of an Inter- Laboratory Comparison: The Radiocarbon Dating of the Shroud of Turin.” Entropy, vol. 22, no. 926, 2020, doi:10.3390/e22090926. Freer-Waters, Rachel, and Timothy Jull. “INVESTIGATING A DATED PIECE OF THE SHROUD OF TURIN.” Radiocarbon, vol. 52, no. 4, 2010, pp. 1521-1527, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200056277. Latendresse, Mario. “Comments on the mass spectrometry analysis of a sample of the Shroud of Turin by Bella et al.” Thermochimica Acta, no. 624, 2016, pp. 55-58, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2015.11.021. Riani, Marco, et al. “Regression analysis with partially labelled regressors: carbon dating of the Shroud of Turin.” Statistics and Computing, vol. 23, 2012, pp. 551-561, DOI 10.1007/s11222-012-9329-5. Rogers, Raymond. “Studies on the radiocarbon sample from the shroud of turin.” Thermochimica Acta, no. 425, 2005, pp. 189-194, doi:10.1016/j.tca.2004.09.029. Walsh, Bryan, and Larry Schwalbe. “An instructive inter-laboratory comparison: The 1988 radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin.” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, no. 29, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.102015.